RISC-V: Make R_RISCV_SUB6 conforms to riscv ABI standard

According to the riscv psabi, R_RISCV_SUB6 only allows 6 least significant
bits are valid, but since binutils implementation, we usually get 8 bits
field for it.  That means, the high 2 bits could be other field and have
different purpose.  Therefore, we should filter the 8 bits to 6 bits before
calculate, and then only encode the valid 6 bits back.  By the way, we also
need the out-of-range check for R_RISCV_SUB6, and the overflow checks for
all R_RISCV_ADD/SUB/SET relocations, but we can add them in the future patches.

Passing riscv-gnu-toolchain regressions.

bfd/ChangeLog:

        * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_relocate_section): Take the R_RISCV_SUB6
	lower 6 bits as the significant bit.
        * elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_elf_add_sub_reloc): Likewise.
diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
index 0570a97..a2d85db 100644
--- a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
+++ b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
@@ -2427,6 +2427,15 @@
 	  break;
 
 	case R_RISCV_SUB6:
+	  {
+	    bfd_vma old_value = bfd_get (howto->bitsize, input_bfd,
+					 contents + rel->r_offset);
+	    relocation = (old_value & ~howto->dst_mask)
+			 | (((old_value & howto->dst_mask) - relocation)
+			    & howto->dst_mask);
+	  }
+	  break;
+
 	case R_RISCV_SUB8:
 	case R_RISCV_SUB16:
 	case R_RISCV_SUB32:
diff --git a/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c b/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
index afbde56..ff9607e 100644
--- a/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
+++ b/bfd/elfxx-riscv.c
@@ -994,6 +994,10 @@
       relocation = old_value + relocation;
       break;
     case R_RISCV_SUB6:
+      relocation = (old_value & ~howto->dst_mask)
+		   | (((old_value & howto->dst_mask) - relocation)
+		      & howto->dst_mask);
+      break;
     case R_RISCV_SUB8:
     case R_RISCV_SUB16:
     case R_RISCV_SUB32: