)]}'
{
  "commit": "2f108d5e69bfc4deb3bcb40798ebb278d292c2fe",
  "tree": "8c8194d9aed8cd0d51ee635e59f6633e72164cd0",
  "parents": [
    "6ca57d1619172ff388bcd96341c999caebdfe344"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Tom de Vries",
    "email": "tdevries@suse.de",
    "time": "Sat Jul 19 17:08:44 2025 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Tom de Vries",
    "email": "tdevries@suse.de",
    "time": "Sat Jul 19 17:08:44 2025 +0200"
  },
  "message": "[gdb/testsuite] Restructure gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp\n\nI noticed that the test names in test-case\ngdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp are a bit inconsistent:\n...\nPASS: $exp: no-cfi: maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH\nPASS: $exp: verify no-filters unwind fail without CFI\nPASS: $exp: maint flush register-cache\nPASS: $exp: verify unwind fail without CFI\nPASS: $exp: cfi: maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH\nPASS: $exp: Verify unwinding works based only on CFI information\n...\n\nThere\u0027s both a no-cfi prefix, and \"without CFI\".\n\nFix this by using proc_with_prefix, getting us a consistent prefix:\n...\nPASS: $exp: no-cfi: maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH\nPASS: $exp: no-cfi: verify no-filters unwind fail\nPASS: $exp: no-cfi: maint flush register-cache\nPASS: $exp: no-cfi: verify unwind fail\nPASS: $exp: cfi: maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH\nPASS: $exp: cfi: Verify unwinding works\n...\n\nWhile we\u0027re at it, use multi_line to make a regexp more readable.\n\nTested on aarch64-linux.\n\nReviewed-By: Keith Seitz \u003ckeiths@redhat.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "36a9d10a9ebc25e1324dd7901c538505ceaec908",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp",
      "new_id": "fce6d679b898ae249cac86fcd8d3d3458091d8b6",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/backtrace-through-cu-nodebug.exp"
    }
  ]
}