tree f4acc1d3c2c07c549a46ccb48c01ac43f15e0ac3
parent cad152f2211282b938f11b021f2acf3df517557e
author Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> 1631556996 +0200
committer Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> 1631556996 +0200

[gdb/tdep] Fix exec check in gdb_print_insn_arm

With a gdb build with --enable-targets=all we run into a KFAIL:
...
KFAIL: gdb.gdb/unittest.exp: executable loaded: maintenance selftest, \
  failed none (PRMS: gdb/27891)
...
due to:
...
Running selftest print_one_insn.^M
Self test failed: arch armv8.1-m.main: self-test failed at \
  disasm-selftests.c:165^M
...

The test fails because we expect disassembling of one arm insn to consume 4
bytes and produce (using verbose = true in disasm-selftests.c):
...
arm mov r0, #0
...
but instead the disassembler uses thumb mode and only consumes 2
bytes and produces:
...
arm movs        r0, r0
...

The failure does not show up in the "no executable loaded" variant because
this code in gdb_print_insn_arm isn't triggered:
...
  if (current_program_space->exec_bfd () != NULL)
    info->flags |= USER_SPECIFIED_MACHINE_TYPE;
...
and consequently we do this in print_insn:
...
      if ((info->flags & USER_SPECIFIED_MACHINE_TYPE) == 0)
        info->mach = bfd_mach_arm_unknown;
...
and don't set force_thumb to true in select_arm_features.

The code in gdb_print_insn_arm makes the assumption that the disassembly
architecture matches the exec architecture, which in this case is incorrect,
because the exec architecture is x86_64, and the disassembly architecture is
armv8.1-m.main.  Fix that by explicitly checking it:
...
  if (current_program_space->exec_bfd () != NULL
      && (current_program_space->exec_bfd ()->arch_info
	  == gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch)))
...

This fixes the print_one_insn failure, so remove the KFAIL.

Tested on x86_64-linux.

Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27891