)]}'
{
  "commit": "35b72e4e5baabef35b34db7f12c627e7232ee204",
  "tree": "52c6107c68d7579c73a891eb528c1925cb0232ae",
  "parents": [
    "bc6004dfd2654e53d6f167b985b38ca780e79228"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Pedro Alves",
    "email": "pedro@palves.net",
    "time": "Wed Mar 30 14:31:56 2022 +0100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Pedro Alves",
    "email": "pedro@palves.net",
    "time": "Tue May 17 10:31:36 2022 +0100"
  },
  "message": "gdb.base/scope.exp: Remove bogus gdb_test questions\n\nThis test is abusing the QUESTION/RESPONSE feature to send an\nalternative command to GDB if the first command fails.  Like so:\n\n   gdb_test \"print \u0027scope0.c\u0027::filelocal\" \\\n\t    \"\\\\\\$$decimal \u003d 1\" \"print \u0027scope0.c\u0027::filelocal at main\" \\\n\t    \"No symbol \\\"scope0.c\\\" in current context.*\" \\\n\t    \"print \u0027$srcdir/$subdir/scope0.c\u0027::filelocal\"\n\nSo if \u0027scope0.c\u0027 doesn\u0027t work, we try again with\n\u0027$srcdir/$subdir/scope0.c\u0027.  I strongly suspect this is really an\nobsolete test.  I think that if \u0027$srcdir/$subdir/scope0.c\u0027 works, then\n\u0027scope0.c\u0027 should have worked too, thus I\u0027d think that if we pass due\nto the question path, then it\u0027s a bug.  So just remove the question\npart passed to gdb_test.\n\nChange-Id: I2acc99285f1d519284051b49693b5441fbdfe3cd\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "19a85bcd244368b9866df6690a05992a4c11ec19",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp",
      "new_id": "a8ddb61350ae2d66f9e514e712926980169af748",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/scope.exp"
    }
  ]
}