)]}'
{
  "commit": "3c238e032f52df2eecbb10382995eda206fc9947",
  "tree": "13f3302407b3c64475616ed1b436777e594a1e55",
  "parents": [
    "53e6563141335737904685f7dac9ea0618c36319"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Tom Tromey",
    "email": "tom@tromey.com",
    "time": "Mon Jan 20 11:06:21 2025 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Tom Tromey",
    "email": "tom@tromey.com",
    "time": "Wed Sep 10 16:05:27 2025 -0600"
  },
  "message": "Put all CTF symbols in global scope\n\nThe new approach to searching (solely via the quick API) is more\nsensitive to discrepancies between the partial and full readers.  In\nCTF, there is some disagreement about which scope to use.  CTF doesn\u0027t\nseem to really distinguish between the file and global scope, so this\npatch takes the simple approach of putting all CTF symbols into the\nglobal scope.\n\nThis changes one test as well.  It seems to me that the behavior here\nis arbitrary and the test is making unwarranted assumptions.\n\nAcked-By: Simon Marchi \u003csimon.marchi@efficios.com\u003e\n\n\n\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "76de16ccc21445d478d8229784664d3b8cf4f5cf",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "gdb/ctfread.c",
      "new_id": "4761b369c2f2034d500078abe9d572f4b3662111",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "gdb/ctfread.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "922729f1a41cb17cf8f3f57c0ddc3fa819ccc333",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "gdb/testsuite/gdb.ctf/cross-tu-cyclic.exp",
      "new_id": "2a0e99990b8036a89f9a5eaf096303991d69eeae",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "gdb/testsuite/gdb.ctf/cross-tu-cyclic.exp"
    }
  ]
}