gdb/python: implement Python find_exec_by_build_id hook
Implement extension_language_ops::find_objfile_from_buildid within
GDB's Python API. Doing this allows users to write Python extensions
that can help locate missing objfiles when GDB opens a core file. A
handler might perform some project- or site-specific actions to find a
missing objfile. Or might provide some project- or site-specific
advice to the user on how they can obtain the missing objfile.
The implementation is very similar to the approach taken in:
commit 8f6c452b5a4e50fbb55ff1d13328b392ad1fd416
Date: Sun Oct 15 22:48:42 2023 +0100
gdb: implement missing debug handler hook for Python
The following new commands are added as commands implemented in
Python, this is similar to how the Python missing debug and unwinder
commands are implemented:
info missing-objfile-handlers
enable missing-objfile-handler LOCUS HANDLER
disable missing-objfile-handler LOCUS HANDLER
To make use of this extension hook a user will create missing objfile
handler objects, and registers these handlers with GDB. When GDB
opens a core file and encounters a missing objfile each handler is
called in turn until one is able to help. Here is a minimal handler
that does nothing useful:
import gdb
import gdb.missing_objfile
class MyFirstHandler(gdb.missing_objfile.MissingObjfileHandler):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__("my_first_handler")
def __call__(self, pspace, build_id, filename):
# This handler does nothing useful.
return None
gdb.missing_objfile.register_handler(None, MyFirstHandler())
Returning None from the __call__ method tells GDB that this handler
was unable to find the missing objfile, and GDB should ask any other
registered handlers.
Possible return values from a handler:
- None: This means the handler couldn't help. GDB will call other
registered handlers to see if they can help instead.
- False: The handler has done all it can, but the objfile couldn't
be found. GDB will not call any other handlers, and will
continue without the objfile.
- True: The handler has installed the objfile into a location where
GDB would normally expect to find it. GDB should repeat its
normal lookup process and the objfile should now be found.
- A string: The handler can return a filename, which is the missing
objfile. GDB will load this file.
Handlers can be registered globally, or per program space. GDB checks
the handlers for the current program space first, and then all of the
global handles. The first handler that returns a value that is not
None, has "handled" the missing objfile, at which point GDB continues.
The implementation of this feature is mostly straight forward. I have
reworked some of the missing debug file related code so that it can be
shared with this feature. E.g. gdb/python/lib/gdb/missing_files.py is
mostly content moved from gdb/python/lib/gdb/missing_debug.py, but
updated to be more generic. Now gdb/python/lib/gdb/missing_debug.py
and the new file gdb/python/lib/gdb/missing_objfile.py both call into
the missing_files.py file.
For gdb/python/lib/gdb/command/missing_files.py this is even more
extreme, gdb/python/lib/gdb/command/missing_debug.py is completely
gone now and gdb/python/lib/gdb/command/missing_files.py provides all
of the new commands in a generic way.
I have made one change to the existing Python API, I renamed the
attribute Progspace.missing_debug_handlers to
Progspace.missing_file_handlers. I don't see this as too
problematic. This attribute was only used to implement the missing
debug feature and was never documented beyond the fact that it
existed. There was no reason for users to be touching this attribute.
Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
16 files changed
