)]}'
{
  "commit": "9b38e80ce8835076e276267e2266774bfb410ee4",
  "tree": "f493ac246d3c0b175da0479122060f01478061ff",
  "parents": [
    "93f536d813c41527e8c939a5f8a90a4b37a5abab"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Tom de Vries",
    "email": "tdevries@suse.de",
    "time": "Tue Oct 14 18:00:48 2025 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Tom de Vries",
    "email": "tdevries@suse.de",
    "time": "Tue Oct 14 18:00:48 2025 +0200"
  },
  "message": "[gdb/testsuite] Fix xfail in gdb.ada/variant_record_field.exp\n\nOn ppc64-linux (debian 14) I run into:\n...\n(gdb) print p_record^M\n$1 \u003d (kind \u003d\u003e five, i \u003d\u003e \u003cerror reading variable: \\\n  access outside bounds of object\u003e^M\n(gdb) gdb_do_cache: get_compiler_info_1 ( c )\nget_compiler_info: gcc-15-2-0\ngdb_do_cache: get_compiler_info_1 ( c )\nFAIL: gdb.ada/variant_record_field.exp: print p_record\n...\n\nThe test-case contains an xfail for \"[gcc_major_version] \u003c\u003d 14\", which doesn\u0027t\ntrigger because gcc has version 15.2.0, while gnatmake does have version\n14.3.0:\n...\n$ gcc --version\ngcc (Debian 15.2.0-4) 15.2.0\n  ...\n$ gnatmake --version\nGNATMAKE 14.3.0\n...\n\nFix this by using \"[gnat_version_compare \u003c 15]\" instead.\n\nTested on ppc64-linux and x86_64-linux.\n\nApproved-By: Tom Tromey \u003ctom@tromey.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "fb5361d8b11ec077e17b68764e465445670774c7",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/variant_record_field.exp",
      "new_id": "13088104edb93d445934bf75a0e84a9f603c41cb",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/variant_record_field.exp"
    }
  ]
}