gdb.ada/mi_var_access.exp
The NUMCHILD value for the "A_String_Access" test differs for X86 and
PowerPC. The patch substitutes $decimal instead of "1" to match the value
of NUMCHILD.
The test "-var-update A_String_Access" generates different output depending
on the value of VAROBJ_UPDATE_RESULT.TYPE_CHANGED. If the value is true,
the strings "new_type" and "new_num_children" are printed along with their
values.
The VAROBJ_UPDATE_RESULT.TYPE_CHANGED value is true on PowerPC which
produces the output:
Expecting: ^(-var-update A_String_Access[
]+)?(\^done,changelist=\[\{name="A_String_Access",in_scope="true",type_changed="false",has_more="0"\}\][
]+[(]gdb[)]
[ ]*)
-var-update A_String_Access
^done,changelist=[{name="A_String_Access",in_scope="true",type_changed="true",new_type="pck.string_access",new_num_children="1",has_more="0"}]
(gdb)
FAIL: gdb.ada/mi_var_access.exp: update at stop 2 (unexpected output)
The patch adds a second possible result string for the test
$re_varobj_update_result_type to match the case when type_changed is true.
Currently for the mi_var_access.exp test VAROBJ_UPDATE_RESULT.TYPE_CHANGED
is true on PowerPC and false on X86-64.
Fixes 2 failures on PowerPC.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
1 file changed
