| // 5.3.4/19: If the lookup finds the two-parameter form of a usual |
| // deallocation function (3.7.4.2) and that function, considered as a |
| // placement deallocation function, would have been selected as a match for |
| // the allocation function, the program is ill-formed. |
| |
| // But we should only complain about using op delete (void *, size_t) for |
| // placement delete if it would also be selected for normal delete, not if |
| // there's also an op delete (void *). |
| |
| typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; |
| |
| struct A |
| { |
| A(); |
| void* operator new (size_t, size_t); |
| void operator delete (void *, size_t); // { dg-message "non-placement" } |
| }; |
| |
| struct B |
| { |
| B(); |
| void * operator new (size_t); |
| void * operator new (size_t, size_t); |
| void operator delete (void *); |
| void operator delete (void *, size_t); |
| }; |
| |
| int main() |
| { |
| A* ap = new (24) A; // { dg-error "placement" } |
| B* bp = new (24) B; |
| } |
