Re: PE objdump -x
All of these buffer overrun tests are better written as a comparison
against size remaining, due to ISO C 9899 standard 6.5.2 para 8
regarding adding a constant to a pointer:
"If both the pointer operand and the result point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object,
the evaluation shall not produce an overflow; otherwise, the behavior
is undefined."
So "ex_dta + 4" might be undefined behaviour, if you interpret "the
array object" in this case to be the malloc'd section contents!
* pei-x86_64.c (pex64_get_unwind_info): Tidy sanity checks.
(pex64_xdata_print_uwd_codes): Likewise.
diff --git a/bfd/pei-x86_64.c b/bfd/pei-x86_64.c
index 795bf66..9d0ff81 100644
--- a/bfd/pei-x86_64.c
+++ b/bfd/pei-x86_64.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
memset (ui, 0, sizeof (struct pex64_unwind_info));
- if (ex_dta >= ex_dta_end || ex_dta + 4 > ex_dta_end)
+ if (ex_dta_end - ex_dta < 4)
return false;
ui->Version = PEX64_UWI_VERSION (ex_ui->Version_Flags);
@@ -123,14 +123,14 @@
ui->rawUnwindCodes = ex_dta + 4;
ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd = ex_dta_end;
- ex_dta += ui->SizeOfBlock;
- if (ex_dta > ex_dta_end)
+ if ((size_t) (ex_dta_end - ex_dta) < ui->SizeOfBlock)
return false;
+ ex_dta += ui->SizeOfBlock;
switch (ui->Flags)
{
case UNW_FLAG_CHAININFO:
- if (ex_dta + 12 > ex_dta_end)
+ if (ex_dta_end - ex_dta < 12)
return false;
ui->rva_BeginAddress = bfd_get_32 (abfd, ex_dta + 0);
ui->rva_EndAddress = bfd_get_32 (abfd, ex_dta + 4);
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
case UNW_FLAG_EHANDLER:
case UNW_FLAG_UHANDLER:
case UNW_FLAG_FHANDLER:
- if (ex_dta + 4 > ex_dta_end)
+ if (ex_dta_end - ex_dta < 4)
return false;
ui->rva_ExceptionHandler = bfd_get_32 (abfd, ex_dta);
ui->SizeOfBlock += 4;
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@
i = 0;
- if (ui->rawUnwindCodes + ui->CountOfCodes * 2 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if ((size_t) (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - ui->rawUnwindCodes)
+ < ui->CountOfCodes * 2)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
@@ -226,7 +227,7 @@
case UWOP_ALLOC_LARGE:
if (info == 0)
{
- if (dta + 4 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - dta < 4)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
@@ -236,7 +237,7 @@
}
else
{
- if (dta + 6 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - dta < 6)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
@@ -261,7 +262,7 @@
break;
case UWOP_SAVE_NONVOL:
- if (dta + 4 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - dta < 4)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
@@ -273,7 +274,7 @@
break;
case UWOP_SAVE_NONVOL_FAR:
- if (dta + 6 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - dta < 6)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
@@ -287,7 +288,7 @@
case UWOP_SAVE_XMM:
if (ui->Version == 1)
{
- if (dta + 4 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - dta < 4)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
@@ -305,7 +306,7 @@
break;
case UWOP_SAVE_XMM_FAR:
- if (dta + 6 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - dta < 6)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
@@ -317,7 +318,7 @@
break;
case UWOP_SAVE_XMM128:
- if (dta + 4 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - dta < 4)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
@@ -329,7 +330,7 @@
break;
case UWOP_SAVE_XMM128_FAR:
- if (dta + 6 > ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd)
+ if (ui->rawUnwindCodesEnd - dta < 6)
{
fprintf (file, _("warning: corrupt unwind data\n"));
return;
