|  | # Copyright 2020-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. | 
|  |  | 
|  | # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify | 
|  | # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by | 
|  | # the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or | 
|  | # (at your option) any later version. | 
|  | # | 
|  | # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, | 
|  | # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of | 
|  | # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the | 
|  | # GNU General Public License for more details. | 
|  | # | 
|  | # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License | 
|  | # along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. | 
|  |  | 
|  | # Check for an issue in GDB where buildsym_compunit::record_line was | 
|  | # removing duplicate line table entries, but skip_prologue_using_sal | 
|  | # depends on these duplicates to spot the end of the prologue. | 
|  | # | 
|  | # When the de-duplication was added this regression was not spotted as | 
|  | # it requires a particular combination of a (very) small function | 
|  | # being inlined into an also very small outer function. | 
|  | # | 
|  | # See also gdb.dwarf/dw2-inline-small-func.exp for a version of this | 
|  | # test that makes use of the Dejagnu DWARF compiler. | 
|  | # | 
|  | # This test simply compiles with optimization and checks that GDB can | 
|  | # do something suitable with the compiled binary.  Problems with this | 
|  | # test are most likely to occur when GDB asks the target specific code | 
|  | # to skip the prologue (gdbarch_skip_prologue).  Some targets make use | 
|  | # of skip_prologue_using_sal, which should be fine, however, some | 
|  | # targets make a poor attempt to duplicate parts of | 
|  | # skip_prologue_using_sal, these targets could easily fail this test. | 
|  | # This is not (necessarily) a problem with this test, but could | 
|  | # indicate a weakness with the target in question. | 
|  |  | 
|  | standard_testfile inline-small-func.c inline-small-func.h | 
|  |  | 
|  | if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} \ | 
|  | [list $srcfile] {debug optimize=-O1}] } { | 
|  | return -1 | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | if ![runto_main] { | 
|  | return -1 | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | # Delete all breakpoints so that the output of "info breakpoints" | 
|  | # below will only contain a single breakpoint. | 
|  | delete_breakpoints | 
|  |  | 
|  | # Place a breakpoint within the function in the header file. | 
|  | set linenum [gdb_get_line_number "callee: body" $srcfile2] | 
|  | gdb_breakpoint "${srcfile2}:${linenum}" | 
|  |  | 
|  | # Check that the breakpoint was placed where we expected.  It should | 
|  | # appear at the requested line.  When the bug in GDB was present the | 
|  | # breakpoint would be placed on one of the following lines instead. | 
|  | gdb_test "info breakpoints" \ | 
|  | ".* in callee at \[^\r\n\]+${srcfile2}:${linenum}\\y.*" |