LoongArch: Use more appropriate assertions for the relocation of TLS LE

PR ld/33427

Patches introduced in the GCC mainline:

commit 8cad8f94b450be9b73d07bdeef7fa1778d3f2b96
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri Sep 5 15:40:51 2025 -0700

    c: Update TLS model after processing a TLS variable

    Set a tentative TLS model in grokvardecl and update TLS mode with
    the default TLS access model after a TLS variable has been fully
    processed if the default TLS access model is stronger,

triggered a linker error when building glibc using build-many-glibcs.py.

See: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-September/144225.html

This fix uses more appropriate assertions.

(cherry picked from commit 87961e47c3666d0527b8ce60e56617e63db0a6c4)
diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c b/bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c
index 7c3e9cd..04c043a 100644
--- a/bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c
+++ b/bfd/elfnn-loongarch.c
@@ -4378,7 +4378,7 @@
 	case R_LARCH_TLS_LE_LO12_R:
 	case R_LARCH_TLS_LE64_LO20:
 	case R_LARCH_TLS_LE64_HI12:
-	  BFD_ASSERT (resolved_local && elf_hash_table (info)->tls_sec);
+	  BFD_ASSERT (bfd_link_executable (info));
 
 	  relocation += rel->r_addend;
 	  relocation = tlsoff (info, relocation);
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-loongarch-elf/ld-loongarch-elf.exp b/ld/testsuite/ld-loongarch-elf/ld-loongarch-elf.exp
index 7e5fdfa..fcfee7e 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-loongarch-elf/ld-loongarch-elf.exp
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-loongarch-elf/ld-loongarch-elf.exp
@@ -171,6 +171,18 @@
       ] \
   ] \
   }
+
+  run_ld_link_tests \
+      [list \
+	   [list \
+		"undefind weak with tls le" \
+		"" "-e0" \
+		"" \
+		{undefweak_le.s} \
+		{} \
+		"undefweak_le" \
+	   ] \
+      ]
 }
 
 if [istarget "loongarch64-*-*"] {
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-loongarch-elf/undefweak_le.s b/ld/testsuite/ld-loongarch-elf/undefweak_le.s
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6e73018
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-loongarch-elf/undefweak_le.s
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+_start:
+	lu12i.w	$t0,%le_hi20_r(undefweak_le)
+	add.d	$t0,$t0,$tp,%le_add_r(undefweak_le)
+	ld.d	$t0,$t0,%le_lo12_r(undefweak_le)
+
+	.weak	undefweak_le
+	.hidden	undefweak_le