| In the near future: | |
| ******************** | |
| * Port the migration of all code from ltconfig into libtool.m4 to the | |
| multi-language-branch, so that CVS automake can remove its references | |
| to ltconfig. | |
| * Fix the following bugs in libltdl: | |
| - error reporting of tryall_dlopen(): | |
| if the file actually doesn't exist (stat() fails or it wasn't dlpreopened) | |
| -> report `file not found' | |
| if it cannot be loaded (e.g. due to missing dependencies) | |
| -> report dlerror | |
| open question: which error should be reported if all dlloaders fail | |
| or if a specific module type can only be loaded by one of them, how report its dlerror? | |
| Also report dlerror() for dlclose and dlsym if available | |
| - Make sure that the dependency_libs of a dlpreopened module won't be loaded. | |
| * Check whether the version of libtool.m4 is compatible with | |
| ltconfig/ltmain.sh. Meanwhile, the recommended approach for | |
| developers using automake is to insert libtool.m4 in acinclude.m4. | |
| * We could have an option to hardcode paths into libraries, as well as | |
| binaries: `... -Wl,-soname -Wl,/tmp/libtest.so.0 ...'. This is not | |
| possible on all platforms, and is in part obviated by the ability of | |
| linking libtool libraries specified with -lname, but it might still | |
| be desirable. | |
| * Lists of exported symbols should be stored in the pseudo library | |
| so that the size of lt_preloaded_symbols can be reduced. | |
| * Have some option to tell libtool not to include -L flags that point | |
| into a certain tree in the dependence list of an installed library. | |
| For example: -L-$top_builddir would let one link with libtool | |
| libraries in sibling subdirectories within a project, using the -L | |
| notation, without getting builddir pathnames ever mentioned in .la | |
| files that get installed. | |
| * Eric Lemings <elemings@cyberia.lemings.com> writes: | |
| Because of a growing number of config scripts for packages in GNOME 1.2 | |
| (e.g. glib-config, xml-config, orbit-config. etc), development of GNOME | |
| 2.0 spawned a separate tool called pkg-config that allows all packages | |
| to use one tool rather than several different scripts to query compile | |
| flags, link flags, and other configuration data. | |
| The functionality of pkg-config seems to me to have a lot of overlap | |
| with the goals of libtool. I was wondering if anyone had considered | |
| adding an eighth mode to libtool that just queries the installed | |
| library for the same information that pkg-config provides. Since | |
| most packages that use pkg-config also use libtool, I think this | |
| would be a good way to reduce maintainer and developer dependencies. | |
| In the future: | |
| ************** | |
| * The definitions for AC_LTDL_SHLIBEXT, AC_LTDL_SHLIBPATH and | |
| AC_LTDL_SYSSEARCHPATH should not rely on the _LT_AC_LTCONFIG_HACK | |
| macro. This involves moving the code which sets the variables | |
| library_names_spec, shlibpath_var and sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec from | |
| into a separate macro, and AC_REQUIRING the newly extracted macro in the | |
| respective ltdl.m4 macros. | |
| * Godmar Back writes: | |
| libltdl uses such stdio functions as fopen, fgets, feof, fclose, and others. | |
| These functions are not async-signal-safe. While this does not make | |
| libltdl unusable, it restricts its usefulness and puts an | |
| unnecessary burden on the user. | |
| As a remedy, I'd recommend to replace those functions with functions | |
| that POSIX says are async-signal-safe, such as open, read, close. | |
| This will require you to handle interrupted system calls and implement | |
| fgets, but the former isn't hard and there's plenty of implementations | |
| out from which you can steal the latter. | |
| I believe relying on async-signal-safe functions to the greatest extent | |
| possible would greatly improve libltdl's ability to be embedded in and | |
| used by other systems. | |
| * Arrange that EXEEXT suffixes are stripped from wrapper script names | |
| only when needed, and that a timestamp file or a wrapper program is | |
| created with the EXEEXT suffix, so that `make' doesn't build it every | |
| time. | |
| * Figure out how to use data items in dlls with win32. | |
| The difficult part is compiling each object which will be linked with an | |
| import lib differently than if it will be linked with a static lib. This will | |
| almost definitely require that automake pass some hints about linkage in to | |
| each object compilation line. | |
| * jeffdb@goodnet.com writes | |
| all you need to do for mutually dependent | |
| .dll's is to create an implib from a .def file | |
| so it appears that we might need to detect and handle mutual dependencies | |
| specially on win32 =(O| | |
| * If not cross-compiling, have the static flag test run the resulting | |
| binary to make sure everything works. | |
| * Implement full multi-language support. Currently, this is only for | |
| C++, but there are beginnings of this in the manual (Other Languages). | |
| This includes writing libtool not to be so dependent on the compiler | |
| used to configure it. | |
| We especially need this for C++ linking, for which libtool currently | |
| does not handle static constructors properly, even on operating | |
| systems that support them. ``Don't use static constructors'' is no | |
| longer a satisfactory answer. | |
| * Another form of convenience library is to have undocumented utility | |
| libraries, where only the shared version is installed. | |
| * We could use libtool object convenience libraries that resolve | |
| symbols to be included in a libtool archive. This would require some | |
| sort of -whole-archive option, as well. | |
| * Currently, convenience libraries (.al) are built from .lo objects, | |
| except when --disable-shared. When we can build both shared and | |
| static libraries, we should probably create a .al out of .lo objects | |
| and also a .a out of .o objects. The .al would only be used to create | |
| shared libraries, whereas the .a would be used for creating static | |
| libraries and programs. We could also explicitly support `empty' | |
| convenience libraries, that behave as macros that expand to a set of | |
| -Rs, -Ls and -ls switches. | |
| * We should include tests with convenience libraries and reloadable | |
| objects in the testsuite. | |
| * Try to find a work-around for -[all-]static and libltdl on platforms | |
| that will fail to find dlopening functions in this case. Maybe | |
| creating an alternate libltdl that provides only for dlpreopening, or | |
| creating an additional static library to provide dummy implementations | |
| of the functions that can't be linked statically. This could hardly | |
| be made completely transparent, though. | |
| * Need to finalize the documentation, and give a specification of | |
| `.la' files so that people can depend on their format. This would be | |
| a good thing to put before the maintainance notes. | |
| * Filenames containing shell meta-characters are not properly handled | |
| by libtool. Compiling a file named "a;b.c", for example, fails. | |
| * We could introduce a mechanism to allow for soname rewriting, to | |
| ease multi-libc support. Installers could specify a prefix, suffix or | |
| sed command to modify the soname, and libtool would create the | |
| corresponding link. This would allow for rebuilding a library with | |
| the same version number, but depending on different versions of libc, | |
| for example. In the future, we might even have an option to encode | |
| the sonames of all dependencies of a library into its soname. | |
| * The current implementation of libltdl in a subdirectory doesn't work | |
| properly with AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR using projects. | |
| Things to think about: | |
| ********************** | |
| * Maybe implement full support for other orthogonal library types | |
| (libhello_g, libhello_p, 64 vs 32-bit ABI's, etc). Make these types | |
| configurable. | |
| * Perhaps the iuse of libltdl could be made cleaner by allowing | |
| registration of hook functions to call at various points. This would | |
| hopefully free the user from having to maintain a parallel module | |
| list with user data. This would likely involve being able to carry | |
| additional per user module data in the lt_dlmodule structure -- perhaps | |
| in the form of an associative array keyed by user name? |