| #include "analyzer-decls.h" |
| |
| void test(int n) |
| { |
| int i; |
| |
| __analyzer_dump_exploded_nodes (0); /* { dg-warning "1 processed enode" } */ |
| |
| for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { |
| __analyzer_eval (i < n); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" } */ |
| /* (should report TRUE twice). */ |
| |
| __analyzer_eval (i == 0); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" "1st" } */ |
| /* { dg-warning "FALSE" "2nd" { xfail *-*-* } .-1 } */ |
| /* { dg-warning "UNKNOWN" "status quo" { target *-*-* } .-2 } */ |
| /* TODO(xfail^^^): ideally we ought to figure out i > 0 after 1st iteration. */ |
| |
| __analyzer_eval (i >= 0); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" } */ |
| |
| __analyzer_dump_exploded_nodes (0); /* { dg-warning "2 processed enodes" } */ |
| } |
| |
| __analyzer_eval (i >= n); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" "true" { xfail *-*-* } } */ |
| /* { dg-bogus "UNKNOWN" "unknown" { xfail *-*-* } .-1 } */ |
| |
| __analyzer_eval (i == n); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" "true" { xfail *-*-* } } */ |
| /* { dg-bogus "UNKNOWN" "unknown" { xfail *-*-* } .-1 } */ |
| /* TODO(xfail^^^): it only figures out i >= 256, rather than i == 256. */ |
| |
| __analyzer_dump_exploded_nodes (0); /* { dg-warning "1 processed enode" } */ |
| } |