| #include "analyzer-decls.h" |
| |
| void test(void) |
| { |
| int i; |
| |
| __analyzer_dump_exploded_nodes (0); /* { dg-warning "1 processed enode" } */ |
| |
| for (i=0; i<256; i++) { |
| __analyzer_eval (i < 256); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" } */ |
| /* (should report TRUE twice). */ |
| |
| __analyzer_eval (i == 0); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" } */ |
| /* { dg-warning "FALSE" "2nd" { xfail *-*-* } .-1 } */ |
| /* { dg-warning "UNKNOWN" "status quo" { target *-*-* } .-2 } */ |
| /* TODO(xfail^^^): ideally we ought to figure out i > 0 after 1st iteration. */ |
| |
| __analyzer_eval (i >= 0); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" } */ |
| |
| __analyzer_dump_exploded_nodes (0); /* { dg-warning "2 processed enodes" } */ |
| } |
| |
| __analyzer_eval (i >= 256); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" } */ |
| |
| __analyzer_eval (i == 256); /* { dg-warning "TRUE" "desired" { xfail *-*-* } } */ |
| /* { dg-warning "UNKNOWN" "status quo" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */ |
| /* TODO(xfail^^^): it only figures out i >= 256, rather than i == 256. */ |
| |
| __analyzer_dump_exploded_nodes (0); /* { dg-warning "1 processed enode" } */ |
| } |